The Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) has come forward to categorically reject proposals suggesting the legalisation of casinos as a method to increase non-tax revenue. The country’s highest Islamic authority has declared that such ideas are in direct contradiction to both Islamic teachings and Indonesia’s foundational values.
Religious Leaders Sound Alarm Over Casino Proposal
The controversy began following comments made during a parliamentary hearing on 8 May, where a member of the House of Representatives floated the idea of legalising gambling, specifically casinos, to generate additional state income. The lawmaker cited the United Arab Emirates as a comparative case, referencing its measured steps towards regulated gaming despite its Islamic identity.
In response, MUI Deputy Chairman Anwar Abbas issued a strong statement condemning the notion. He described the proposal as “shocking and irresponsible,” emphasizing that gambling is explicitly prohibited in Islam and should not be entertained in a country where Muslims make up the majority population.
Clash with Constitution and National Ideology
Abbas stressed that legalising gambling would not only conflict with religious doctrine but would also violate the principles of Pancasila, Indonesia’s philosophical foundation that champions morality, justice, and faith. He argued that introducing such a practice risks undermining the moral compass of the nation and could potentially corrode Indonesia’s societal integrity over time.
“Turning to practices forbidden by religion in the name of state revenue is a dangerous precedent,” Abbas warned. “Indonesia must stand firm in its identity as a nation that values ethics, spirituality, and social harmony.”
Call for Lawful Economic Alternatives
Rather than seeking controversial and culturally divisive revenue streams, MUI has urged the government to redirect its focus toward sustainable, lawful development strategies. Suggestions included optimising natural resource management, improving productivity, and investing in employment growth — all while staying within the bounds of religious and national principles.
The council reiterated that Indonesia’s policymaking should be grounded in its historical, cultural, and religious contexts, and warned against short-term economic strategies that could have long-term societal costs.
Moral Imperatives in Governance
The MUI’s statement acts as a clarion call to lawmakers, urging them to reflect deeply on the ethical and spiritual implications of economic policy decisions. As debates continue over how best to boost state revenue, the council insists that any approach must preserve Indonesia’s moral identity and constitutional commitments.
As the proposal gains media attention, it remains to be seen whether the government will proceed with discussions or heed the MUI’s appeal to abandon the idea in favor of more culturally aligned economic solutions.
